Decide what to test first, how deeply to test it and where manual and automated testing effort will create the most value.
Whether you test hands-on, build automated checks or lead the test approach, RiskRover keeps business and product risk, strategy, effort and execution connected.
An established retailer adds a new payment provider. The existing product and its risks stay in view while the team focuses testing on the change. Follow the decisions from familiar templates to a reviewable plan.
Payment Provider IntegrationCommerce Platform — payment upgrade · Fictional retail projectFictional example in the real application
Choose what the team needs to check.
Start with the Basic test-level template: Unit, Integration, System and Acceptance. Use the ISO 25010:2011 quality template with its standard descriptions, then link relevant qualities to components at each level.
Test levels
Unit · Integration · System · Acceptance
Quality template
ISO 25010:2011
Release scope
New provider and payment-status callbacks
Outside this project
Payment provider’s internal systems
Familiar templates provide the vocabulary. The project determines where each level and quality needs coverage.
Enlarge screenshot
Full product scope, with the new payment integration highlighted.
Make the reason for testing visible.
With Pro, the team inherits reviewed risks from the existing product baseline. After confirming they still apply, only the two new components need initial scoring. For payment functionality at System level, likelihood 3 and impact 5 give score 15, Class A.
Likelihood
Medium (3)
Impact
High (5)
Risk score
3 × 5 = 15
Risk class
A · High priority
Inheritance avoids starting over. Review existing ratings when the change affects their assumptions; unchanged components keep their A, B or C classes.
Enlarge screenshot
New payment risk highlighted; existing product risks are retained.
Give testers a decision they can use.
The team chooses Deep (3) testing for the new payment integration. Decision Table Testing covers approval, decline and cancellation rules; State Transition Testing covers pending, paid and failed orders. Existing components receive focused regression checks.
Chosen intensity
3 · Deep
Standard techniques
Decision tables · State transitions
Combine built-in test techniques with approaches tailored to your project. Testers use the strategy to design concrete test cases.
Most effort goes to the two new components. Payment functionality at System level uses 8 × 1.5 × 1.5 × 1 = 18 hours. Existing A, B and C components retain their risk ratings but receive 1.8 hours each for a smaller, simpler regression scope.
Baseline
8 hours
New payment component
18 hours · Functionality
Existing component
1.8 hours · Regression
Risk classes retained
A · B · C
Lower effort reflects the change scope and existing regression coverage, not a lower product risk. Revisit it if the change reaches an existing component.
Enlarge screenshot
Highlighted: the 18-hour component estimate, not the project total.
Bring the reasoning into the review.
Review the effort and budget sections together: substantial coverage of the new payment components, a smaller regression allowance for the existing product, and the activity and role allocations behind the total. The plan includes all four test levels.
Planned activity effort
321.3 hours
Estimated cost
€25,704.80
Available budget
€25,000
Budget gap to resolve
€704.80
The estimate exceeds the budget by €704.80: a visible decision about scope, effort or funding. Review the plan in Free; Word export requires Pro.
Manual planning through all six stages is available on Free. This example also reuses a product baseline with Pro. Pro adds collaboration, exports, integrations and execution.
For individual builders
Building with AI? Give your testing a direction.
Your assistant can help you write code. RiskRover gives it the product scope, risks and test priorities to ask better questions about that code.
Use Builder to draft a product breakdown, compare existing tests with your risk analysis, and review planning changes before saving them. One user, all eight planning steps, plus MCP access.
Stop rebuilding your test approach from scattered information.
Requirements live in one place. Risks in another. The strategy ends up in Word. Execution moves into Jira or Azure DevOps. When scope, timing or budget changes, somebody has to reconstruct how all those decisions fit together.
RiskRover keeps that reasoning with the project.
The testing reality
Why risk-based prioritization matters
Most teams cannot test everything. The important question is whether the trade-offs are deliberate, business-driven and visible to the people doing the work.
When everything cannot be tested, prioritization must be deliberate. Source: Tricentis, 2026 Quality Transformation Report, based on 2,501 respondents across six countries.
Set the test direction — and be ready to explain it.
Turn product risk into a clear test strategy, effort and budget. RiskRover helps you steer testers, answer stakeholder questions and show sponsors where testing time and money are going.
Focus manual, exploratory and automated testing using visible product risk, testing depth and relevant techniques instead of reconstructing priorities from tickets and meetings.
Turn shared workshop decisions into a practical test direction, then carry the supported product and risk structure into RiskRover execution and supported test repositories.
RiskRover coordinates test execution while your connected tools keep ownership of the delivery or test-case state they already manage.
Jira & Xray
Snapshot Jira Sprints as Delivery-based Planning Periods and issues as Work Items; keep assignment and status in Jira. Sync PRA structure to Xray where configured.
Azure DevOps
Snapshot Azure Iterations as Delivery-based Planning Periods and delivery scope as Work Items; keep assignment and status in Azure. Sync PRA structure to Azure Test Plans.
TestRail
Create the PRA section structure while cases and runs remain in TestRail.
</>
API
Connect approved workflows through personal read or read/write API tokens.
Plan and coordinate testing in RiskRover; retain delivery assignment and status in Jira or Azure and detailed cases and runs in the connected test tool.
Simple pricing
Your next step, at your scale.
Plan on your own with Free. Bring product risk into your AI coding workflow with Builder. Coordinate your team with Pro.
Free is for one person, with no company details, VAT number or credit card required. Paid plans are for business use. What you need to start
Prices exclude VAT. The applicable B2B VAT treatment is confirmed before Checkout.
Choose your billing period
For getting started
Free
Build a clear test plan for your project, at your own pace.
RiskRover was built around a recurring project problem: important testing decisions are made in workshops, documents and spreadsheets, then lose their context once execution begins.
The product creates a better way to keep that thinking connected without pretending that software replaces professional judgement.
With your permission, Google Analytics helps us understand how this website is used. You can decline and use the site normally. Change your choice any time in the footer.
